Blog

  • Why Nigeria Cannot and Will Not Tax Your Bank Account – Eben Joels

    Why Nigeria Cannot and Will Not Tax Your Bank Account – Eben Joels

    There is a pervasive fear among Nigerians often fueled by aggressive headlines that the government is on the verge of peering into your bank account and arbitrarily debiting “unpaid taxes” based on your daily transaction alerts.

    The fear is understandable. The government is desperate for revenue. The recent passage of the Income Tax Act (ITA) 2025, a product of the current administration’s tax reform committee, was meant to modernize our archaic tax laws. Despite the fanfare, the new Act has failed to address the fundamental structural flaws in the old Personal Income Tax Act (PITA).

    Here is the cold, hard reality: The Nigerian government cannot and will not tax your bank account directly anytime soon. Here is why.

    The Wrong Taxman has the Data (Federal vs. State)

    The primary safeguard preventing Nigeria from taxing your personal bank account is Nigeria’s federal structure.

    Under the Nigerian constitution and retained by the ITA 2025, the Federal Government (via the FIRS or the newly proposed Nigeria Revenue Service) collects taxes from companies. The State Governments (via their State Internal Revenue Services) collect taxes from individuals.

    This creates a massive disconnect. The Federal Government has the data. Through the NIBSS and BVN frameworks, the Federal Government can theoretically track money flows.  However, the Federal Government cannot legally collect Personal Income Tax (PIT) from you unless you are a police officer, military personnel, or a diplomat. For the remaining 99% of the population, that right belongs to the state where you reside.

    The FIRS cannot simply hand over your banking data to 36 states because of complex data privacy and banking secrecy laws that remain largely unaddressed by the new Act. A simple fix such as enacting a nominal federal income tax (say 1%) would have significantly enabled the sharing of data between Federal and State Tax agencies. It could also be used as tool to transfer funds to the vulnerable rather than the current opaque method done via the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs.

    The 35 Weak Links (State Internal Revenue Services)

    If you live in Lagos, you might have reason to be slightly worried. The Lagos State Internal Revenue Service (LIRS) is an outlier, technologically advanced and aggressive. But for the rest of the country? The system is broken.

    Aside from Lagos and perhaps the FCT, most State Internal Revenue Services (SIRS) are hollow institutions. They are often headed by political appointees; friends of the Governor with zero depth in tax administration or forensic accounting.

    These agencies lack the software to analyze bank statements even if they had them. They lack the political will to compel their wealthy residents to pay the right amount of tax because these wealthy individuals may very well be the sponsors of those holding the highest political positions.

    The State IRS rely almost exclusively on Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE), where companies do the work for them by deducting taxes at the source. They lack the capacity to audit the millions of personal bank accounts within their domain. They are too weak to enforce collection on individuals who do not earn a salary.

    The “Secondee” Loophole

    The most glaring weakness of the ITA 2025 is that it was touted as a reform to capture the wealthy, yet it arguably makes it easier for the ultra-rich to slip away.

    A major flaw exists in the definition of taxable income regarding “Secondees”, expatriates or Nigerians seconded from foreign firms to work in Nigeria. The Act appears to completely exempt the income of a secondee if they can prove they are paying taxes in their “home country.”

    This is a massive oversight. It means a high-earning executive earning $20,000 a month in Nigeria can avoid paying any tax to the Nigerian state by presenting a tax receipt from a low-tax jurisdiction or their home country. While the average Nigerian employee has their tax deducted at source, the high-net-worth individual with complex global income sources is given a legal exit route. If the law cannot even capture the clearly defined income of a corporate executive, it certainly lacks the sophistication to scrutinize the murky inflows of a personal savings account.

    Bank Turnover ≠ Taxable Income

    Finally, there is a legal hurdle that the tax authorities have not cleared. A credit alert in your bank account is not proof of income. If your spouse transfers money to you for school fees, that is not income. If you sell a used car and the buyer transfers cash, that is a return of capital, not necessarily profit. If you receive a refund for a failed transaction, that is not income.

    For a tax authority to tax your bank account, it must first distinguish between revenue and income. This requires a level of forensic auditing that simply does not exist at the state level. They cannot simply apply a flat tax rate to your total credit alerts without facing lawsuits they would almost certainly lose in a working judiciary.

    Conclusion

    While ITA 2025 has rearranged the furniture, the house remains the same. As long as the collection of personal income tax is left to 36 disparate, under-resourced, and politically compromised State Boards, your bank account remains relatively safe.  And as long as every Nigerian does not pay personal income tax to the center, the current tax reforms from a personal income perspective are inchoate.

    The taxman may bark, but until the constitution is amended to centralize personal tax collection or until the States wake up and employ technocrats rather than politicians, he has no teeth to bite your savings.

    Eben Joels is the Managing Partner of Stransact Chartered Accountants, an audit, tax, and consulting firm in Nigeria. He is also a subject-matter expert in International Tax and Financial Reporting Standards and a licensed attorney.

  • Why Nigeria Cannot and Will Not Tax Your Bank Account

    Why Nigeria Cannot and Will Not Tax Your Bank Account

    There is a pervasive fear among Nigerians—often fueled by aggressive headlines—that the government is on the verge of peering into your bank account and arbitrarily debiting “unpaid taxes” based on your daily transaction alerts.

    The fear is understandable. The government is desperate for revenue. The recent passage of the Income Tax Act (ITA) 2025, a product of the current administration’s tax reform committee, was meant to modernize our archaic tax laws. Despite the fanfare, the new Act has failed to address the fundamental structural flaws in the old Personal Income Tax Act (PITA).

    Here is the cold, hard reality: The Nigerian government cannot—and will not—tax your bank account directly anytime soon. Here is why.

    The Wrong Taxman has the Data (Federal vs. State)

    The primary safeguard preventing Nigeria from taxing your personal bank account is Nigeria’s federal structure.

    Under the Nigerian constitution and retained by the ITA 2025, the Federal Government (via the FIRS or the newly proposed Nigeria Revenue Service) collects taxes from companies. The State Governments (via their State Internal Revenue Services) collect taxes from individuals.

    This creates a massive disconnect. The Federal Government has the data. Through the NIBSS and BVN frameworks, the Federal Government can theoretically track money flows.  However, the Federal Government cannot legally collect Personal Income Tax (PIT) from you unless you are a police officer, military personnel, or a diplomat. For the remaining 99% of the population, that right belongs to the state where you reside.

    The FIRS cannot simply hand over your banking data to 36 states because of complex data privacy and banking secrecy laws that remain largely unaddressed by the new Act. A simple fix such as enacting a nominal federal income tax (say 1%) would have significantly enabled the sharing of data between Federal and State Tax agencies. It could also be used as tool to transfer funds to the vulnerable rather than the current opaque method done via the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs.

    The 35 Weak Links (State Internal Revenue Services)

    If you live in Lagos, you might have reason to be slightly worried. The Lagos State Internal Revenue Service (LIRS) is an outlier—technologically advanced and aggressive. But for the rest of the country? The system is broken.

    Aside from Lagos and perhaps the FCT, most State Internal Revenue Services (SIRS) are hollow institutions. They are often headed by political appointees—friends of the Governor with zero depth in tax administration or forensic accounting.

    These agencies lack the software to analyze bank statements even if they had them. They lack the political will to compel their wealthy residents to pay the right amount of tax because these wealthy individuals may very well be the sponsors of those holding the highest political positions.

    The State IRS rely almost exclusively on Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE), where companies do the work for them by deducting taxes at the source. They lack the capacity to audit the millions of personal bank accounts within their domain. They are too weak to enforce collection on individuals who do not earn a salary.

    The “Secondee” Loophole

    The most glaring weakness of the ITA 2025 is that it was touted as a reform to capture the wealthy, yet it arguably makes it easier for the ultra-rich to slip away.

    A major flaw exists in the definition of taxable income regarding “Secondees”—expatriates or Nigerians seconded from foreign firms to work in Nigeria. The Act appears to completely exempt the income of a secondee if they can prove they are paying taxes in their “home country.”

    This is a massive oversight. It means a high-earning executive earning $20,000 a month in Nigeria can avoid paying any tax to the Nigerian state by presenting a tax receipt from a low-tax jurisdiction or their home country. While the average Nigerian employee has their tax deducted at source, the high-net-worth individual with complex global income sources is given a legal exit route. If the law cannot even capture the clearly defined income of a corporate executive, it certainly lacks the sophistication to scrutinize the murky inflows of a personal savings account.

    Bank Turnover ≠ Taxable Income

    Finally, there is a legal hurdle that the tax authorities have not cleared. A credit alert in your bank account is not proof of income. If your spouse transfers money to you for school fees, that is not income. If you sell a used car and the buyer transfers cash, that is a return of capital, not necessarily profit. If you receive a refund for a failed transaction, that is not income.

    For a tax authority to tax your bank account, it must first distinguish between revenue and income. This requires a level of forensic auditing that simply does not exist at the state level. They cannot simply apply a flat tax rate to your total credit alerts without facing lawsuits they would almost certainly lose in a working judiciary.

    Conclusion

    While ITA 2025 has rearranged the furniture, the house remains the same. As long as the collection of personal income tax is left to 36 disparate, under-resourced, and politically compromised State Boards, your bank account remains relatively safe.  And as long as every Nigerian does not pay personal income tax to the center, the current tax reforms from a personal income perspective are inchoate.

    The taxman may bark, but until the constitution is amended to centralize personal tax collection—or until the States wake up and employ technocrats rather than politicians—he has no teeth to bite your savings.

    Eben Joels is the Managing Partner of Stransact Chartered Accountants, an audit, tax, and consulting firm in Nigeria. He is also a subject-matter expert in International Tax and Financial Reporting Standards and a licensed attorney.

  • FRCN Requirements on Internal Control over Financial Reporting [ICFR]

    FRCN Requirements on Internal Control over Financial Reporting [ICFR]

    Over the past two decades, corporate scandals most notably Enron and global financial crises have driven major reforms in financial reporting. For Public Interest Entities (PIEs), this led to the adoption of stronger ICFR frameworks like COSO 2013 Internal Control: Integrated Framework, reinforcing the need for transparency, accountability, and stakeholder trust.

    In Nigeria, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) requires all Public Interest Entities to implement and report on the effectiveness of their ICFR. With the mandate effective from financial years ending on or after 31 December 2024. 2025 marks the second year of mandatory compliance. PIEs are reminded to maintain and annually assess their ICFR, ensuring ongoing transparency, accountability, and independent assurance.

    Read more: Stransact makes World Tax list of Tier-1 firms in tax services

    What Is ICFR and Why Does It Matter?

    Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR) refers to the processes and controls established by management to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with applicable accounting standards.

    ICFR Core Objectives

    • Ensuring transactions are recorded accurately to support the preparation of financial statements.
    • Providing assurance that receipts and expenditures are made only with proper authorization.
    • Safeguarding assets against unauthorized use, loss, or disposition.

    While most organizations already maintain internal controls, what’s evolving is the benchmarking of these controls against globally recognized frameworks most notably, the COSO 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework.

    This shift enhances the effectiveness, consistency, and auditability of ICFR, ensuring that financial statements are not only accurate and complete but also compliant with international best practices.

    Read more: National Repository Portal and Financial Reporting Compliance: A Guide for Nigerian PIEs

    What does FRC expects from Public Interest Entities Management’s Responsibility

    Management is responsible for the design, implementation, and annual certification of ICFR effectiveness. As mandated by the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRCN), this responsibility cannot be delegated to external auditors to preserve their independence. While internal audit or independent consultants may support the process, only management must assess and certify ICFR annually.

    External Auditors’ Role

    External auditors are required to independently review management’s ICFR assessment and issue a separate attestation report, without compromising their independence. This may be conducted as part of an integrated audit, which includes:

    • A distinct ICFR audit (with its own fee), and
    • A financial statement audit informed by ICFR conclusions.

    Even if ICFR is ineffective, it doesn’t mean the financial statements are misstated but it may require more substantive testing and higher audit fees.

    Read more: Financial Reporting in Nigeria: The Critical Role of ICFR

    Call to Action

    • CEOs: Champion ICFR as a continuous, enterprise-wide Ensure it is adequately resourced and embedded into the organization’s governance and risk management framework not treated as a mere compliance checkbox.
    • CFOs: Lead continuous maintenance of ICFR and annual certification of ICFR. Ensure timely, evidence-based assessments and maintain clear documentation to support transparency and audit readiness.
    • External Auditors: Uphold independence by refraining from performing ICFR assessments. They should independently review and attest to management’s ICFR assessment as part of the integrated audit.

    Read more: Why IFRS 18 Should Be a Strategic Priority for CFOs and Financial Leaders

    Looking Ahead: Strengthening Trust Through Effective ICFR Implementation

    As Nigeria’s regulatory landscape continues to evolve, the successful implementation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR) stands as a defining marker of corporate integrity and governance maturity. For Public Interest Entities, this is more than a compliance exercise; it is a commitment to building investor confidence, enhancing financial transparency, and reinforcing accountability across all levels of the organization.

    In 2025 and beyond, organizations that embed ICFR into their governance culture will not only stay compliant but also position themselves as trusted leaders in financial reporting excellence.

  • How the Nigeria Tax Act 2025 Empowers Individual Taxpayers

    How the Nigeria Tax Act 2025 Empowers Individual Taxpayers

    The Nigeria Tax Act (NTA) 2025 represents a landmark reform in the country’s fiscal landscape, particularly for individual taxpayers. Enacted to modernize and harmonize Nigeria’s tax framework, the Act introduces a suite of progressive measures aimed at enhancing equity, simplifying compliance, and delivering tangible reliefs to low and middle-income earners.

    This article explores the key provisions of the NTA 2025 that affect individuals, highlighting the opportunities, reliefs, and incentives embedded in the new law and what they mean for taxpayers, employers, and the broader economy.

    Read more: Stransact makes World Tax list of Tier-1 firms in tax services

    A New Era for Personal Taxation

    The NTA 2025 repeals and replaces the Personal Income Tax Act (PITA) 2011, addressing long-standing ambiguities and introducing a more transparent, inclusive, and equitable tax regime. The reforms are designed to align Nigeria’s tax system with global best practices while ensuring that taxation supports, rather than stifles, economic growth.

    Read more: Nigeria Tax Reform Act: What Businesses Need to Know

    Key Provisions of the NTA 2025 and their Implications

    1. Expanded Definition of Chargeable Income: The Act now explicitly lists items such as: Prizes, winnings, and honoraria, grants, awards, laurels, etc.; profits or gains from transactions in digital or virtual assets; disposal of money or money instruments; profits or gains from the disposal of property or fixed assets; and securities; discounts or rebates, etc., under the scope of taxable income.This eliminates previous ambiguities surrounding the tax treatment of income from emerging sectors and informal sources, thereby widening the tax net and enhancing government revenue without increasing tax rates for compliant taxpayers. It reflects the government’s policy objective of modernizing the tax base to capture new forms of wealth and align Nigeria’s tax framework with global best practices [NTA 2025, Section 4].
    1. Introduction of Rent Relief Deduction: Individual taxpayers can now claim 20% of their annual rent (up to a maximum of ₦500,000) as an Eligible Deduction, provided valid tenancy documentation is provided. This provision is particularly beneficial for salaried workers and urban dwellers, offering meaningful relief from housing-related expenses [NTA 2025, Section 30 (2) (vi)].
    1. Abolition of the Consolidated Relief Allowance (CRA): The CRA, previously a blanket deduction for all taxpayers, has been repealed. In its place, the Act introduces a more itemized and transparent system of deductions, encouraging accurate reporting and aligning tax reliefs with actual expenses incurred.
    1. Enhanced Compensation for Loss of Office: The tax-exempt threshold for compensation due to loss of office has now been increased from ₦10 million to ₦50 million (only the excess above this new threshold will constitute chargeable gains). This change provides greater financial protection for individuals facing job termination or workplace-related injuries [NTA 2025, Section 50 (1)].
    1. Revised Progressive Tax Bands: The Act introduces a new progressive tax structure, adjusting rates from the previous 7%–24% under PITA to 0%–25% under the NTA. This ensures that:
    • Low-income earners (earning the minimum wage and below /month) are exempt from income tax
    • Middle-income earners benefit from reduced tax burdens
    • High-income earners contribute a fairer share of their income towards national development
      [NTA Fourth schedule).
    1. Clarified Definitions for Key Tax Terms: To eliminate ambiguity and reduce disputes, the Act provides precise definitions for terms such as:
    • Non-Resident Individual (NRI); Interest; Dividend; Royalty
    • This clarity enhances legal certainty and simplifies compliance for both taxpayers and tax administrators [NTA 2025, Sections 7-8, 202].

    Other Notable Provisions and Compliance Implications

    Beyond the major reforms highlighted above, the Nigeria Tax Act 2025 introduces several additional measures that shape how individuals earn, report, and manage their tax obligations.

    • Taxation of Capital and Chargeable Gains: The Act consolidates the taxation of chargeable gains, bringing profits from the disposal of property, securities, or other assets directly within the personal income tax framework. This integration simplifies administration but also means that individuals must now evaluate the tax impact of every asset sale or transfer. Certain exemptions remain for personal residences and low-value personal assets.
    • Clarified Residence and Source Rules: Sections 7 – 8 establish clearer tests for determining whether an individual is resident in Nigeria and whether income is derived from Nigerian sources. These provisions are especially relevant for Nigerians earning from remote or cross-border work, digital businesses, or offshore investments. Proper documentation of residence and income source will be critical for compliance.
    • Broader Range of Allowable Deductions: In addition to the new rent relief, the NTA 2025 retains or clarifies deductions for pension contributions, National Housing Fund (NHF), and National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) contributions, as well as verified donations to approved charitable causes. These provisions reward documented savings and social contributions, encouraging a more structured financial culture.
    • Presumptive Taxation for Informal Income Earners: To improve inclusion and widen the tax net, the Act empowers the tax authorities to apply presumptive assessment frameworks for individuals or micro-enterprises with incomplete records. This ensures that self-employed and gig-economy earners contribute fairly, while still providing mechanisms for appeal and voluntary disclosure.
    • Digitalization and Enhanced Compliance Obligations: Complementing the NTA are reforms under the Nigeria Tax Administration Act 2025, which mandate electronic filing, use of Tax Identification Numbers (TINs), and stricter record-keeping for individuals. Taxpayers are therefore encouraged to adopt digital compliance tools and maintain proper documentation to avoid penalties.
    • Effective Date and Transition Arrangements: Most provisions of the NTA 2025 relating to individuals take effect from 1 January 2026, giving taxpayers time to understand the new framework and adjust their financial and payroll systems accordingly. Transitional guidelines are expected from the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and relevant State Tax Authorities to aid smooth implementation.

    Read more: Why IFRS 18 Should Be a Strategic Priority for CFOs and Financial Leaders

    Beyond Compliance: A Pathway to Financial Empowerment

    The NTA 2025 is not merely a legislative update, it is a strategic tool for financial empowerment. By offering targeted reliefs and incentives, the Act encourages individuals to: Plan their finances more effectively, leverage available deductions and engage proactively with the tax system.

    For employers, the reforms necessitate a review of payroll systems, employee benefits, and vendor engagement processes to ensure full alignment with the new tax framework.

    Read more: Stransact expands horizon, unveils Deals and Advisory Services

    Looking Ahead: A More Inclusive Tax Culture

    The Nigeria Tax Act 2025 positions personal taxation as a catalyst for inclusive economic growth. By prioritizing fairness, transparency, and simplicity, it fosters a culture of voluntary compliance and trust in the tax system.

    Whether you are a salaried employee, entrepreneur, or investor, the new law offers a timely opportunity to reassess your financial strategy, maximize your tax benefits, and contribute meaningfully to national development.

  • How Telecom Operators, Fintech and Retail Brands Can Leverage MVNO Licenses in Nigeria

    How Telecom Operators, Fintech and Retail Brands Can Leverage MVNO Licenses in Nigeria

    In 2023, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) introduced a structured licensing regime for Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) to enhance competition and expand digital inclusion. According to BusinessDay (2025), the NCC issued 46 MVNO licenses across five tiers, representing one of the most ambitious frameworks in Africa. However, as of August 2025, only two operators: Vitel Wireless and EmoSIM have commenced commercial operations. This disparity between policy ambition and market activation prompts a critical evaluation of Nigeria’s progress in telecom liberalization.

    Understanding Mobile Virtual Network Operators

    MVNOs deliver mobile services without owning radio access networks or spectrum. Instead, they lease capacity from incumbent Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) and differentiate through customer segmentation, pricing models, bundled offerings, user experience, and distribution strategies. Globally, MVNOs have demonstrated effectiveness in:

    • Stimulating innovation through niche offerings tailored to students, rural users, SMEs, travelers, and fintech-oriented customers.
    • Enhancing affordability by exerting downward pressure on retail prices and enabling targeted bundles.
    • Deepening market segmentation through localized content and flexible service plans.

    Nigeria’s Licensing Framework: A Step Forward

    The NCC’s five-tier licensing model represents a significant advancement in liberalizing the telecommunications sector. It accommodates varying degrees of operational independence, ranging from basic resellers to full-service providers with core network capabilities. This flexible structure is designed to attract a diverse array of market participants, including startups and established technology firms.

    Furthermore, the framework aligns with Nigeria’s National Broadband Plan and Digital Economy Strategy, which aim to increase broadband penetration and bridge the digital divide. In principle, MVNOs are well-positioned to extend connectivity to underserved regions and reduce data costs. The licensing tiers include:

    • Tier 1 (Reseller MVNOs): Focus on branding, distribution, and customer service, relying entirely on MNOs for network operations.
    • Tier 2 (Service Provider MVNOs): Manage customer care, billing, and select value-added services.
    • Tier 3 (Core MVNOs): Operate critical network elements such as the Home Location Register (HLR) and Home Subscriber Server (HSS), while leasing radio access.
    • Tier 4 (Aggregator/Enabler MVNOs): Aggregate network capacity and wholesale it to smaller MVNOs, reducing the need for direct MNO agreements.
    • Tier 5 (Full MVNOs): Function nearly as MNOs, operating core networks while leasing spectrum and radio access.

    Read more: International Tax Review (ITR) Ranks Stransact Chartered Accountants Among Tier-1 Firms

    The Execution Gap

    Despite a robust framework, market activation has been limited. BusinessDay (2025) reports that only Vitel Wireless and EmoSIM have launched commercially, out of the 46 licensed MVNOs. Several challenges have impeded progress:

    • Infrastructure Bottlenecks: MVNOs depend on MNOs for network access, and negotiations over pricing and service-level agreements have proven complex.
    • Market Readiness: Many MVNOs lack the technical and financial capacity to scale operations. The Nigerian market remains price-sensitive and dominated by a few major MNOs.
    • Regulatory Ambiguity: While the NCC has issued a licensing framework, there is limited clarity regarding enforcement mechanisms, dispute resolution, and consumer protection specific to MVNOs.

    Untapped Potential

    Nigeria continues to present substantial growth opportunities. Mobile internet adoption remains low, and millions of citizens are underserved or offline. MVNOs can address this gap by offering:

    • Localized propositions, including language-specific content and regionally tailored pricing models.
    • Flexible commercial models such as family wallets, shared data plans, and SME-focused bundles.
    • Embedded connectivity for fintech, edtech, and health tech applications, bundling data with essential services.

    According to Grand View Research (2025), the global MVNO market is projected to reach USD 137.31 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 7.7%. Nigeria possesses the demographic and digital appetite to capture a meaningful share of this market, provided enabling conditions are established.

    Read more: Why IFRS 18 Should Be a Strategic Priority for CFOs and Financial Leaders

    Strategic Imperatives

    To realize the full potential of MVNOs, several strategic interventions are necessary:

    • Infrastructure Sharing Mandates: The NCC should enforce equitable access terms between MNOs and MVNOs to prevent anti-competitive practices.
    • Capacity Building: Technical and financial support for MVNO startups is essential to bridge the execution gap.
    • Consumer Awareness: Public education initiatives can enhance understanding of MVNO offerings and their value proposition.
    • Policy Integration: MVNO strategy should be harmonized with broader digital economy initiatives, including rural broadband expansion and financial inclusion.

    Read more: From Traditional to Digital: How Financial Services Can Thrive in the Era of Fintech

    Conclusion

    MVNO licensing in Nigeria is a commendable initiative with transformative potential. However, without effective execution, it risks becoming a missed opportunity. The regulatory framework is in place, market demand is evident, and digital inclusion remains a national priority. A coordinated effort by regulators, operators, and innovators is imperative to translate policy into tangible progress.

  • Why IFRS 18 Should Be a Strategic Priority for CFOs and Financial Leaders

    Why IFRS 18 Should Be a Strategic Priority for CFOs and Financial Leaders

    For years, CFOs and investors have struggled with varying interpretations of “operating profit,” making it difficult to compare performance and assess value accurately. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is addressing this challenge with IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, a transformative standard effective January 1, 2027.

    More than a compliance update, IFRS 18 is a strategic shift, that establishes a disciplined framework that enhances transparency, strengthens audit reliability, and reinforces stakeholder confidence in financial reporting.

    The Core Change: A Structured Financial Narrative

    IFRS 18 introduces a disciplined framework for the income statement, requiring companies to classify all income and expenses into three distinct categories:

    • Operating: Core business activities
    • Investing: Returns from non-core assets
    • Financing: Costs of capital and interest

    It mandates three standardized subtotals:

    • Operating profit or loss.
    • Profit or loss before financing and income tax.
    • Profit or loss.

    This structure eliminates ambiguity and ensures that operating profit reflects only the results of primary business activities before financing and investment effects.

    Crucially, IFRS 18 also brings Management-defined Performance Measures (MPMs), non-GAAP metrics like EBITDA into the scope of audited financial statements. Companies must now reconcile MPMs to IFRS-defined subtotals in a dedicated note, ending the era of opaque investor presentations.

    Read more: National Repository Portal and Financial Reporting Compliance: A Guide for Nigerian PIEs

    Strategic Impact on Investment Valuation

    For investors, analysts, and valuation professionals, IFRS 18 is a game-changer:

    • Enhanced Comparability: Peer benchmarking becomes more reliable, especially for metrics like EV/EBIT.
    • Improved Forecasting: DCF and earnings models benefit from clearer categorization of recurring vs. non-recurring items.
    • Reduced Risk Premium: Greater transparency lowers uncertainty, potentially reducing the cost of capital.

    Example in Practice:
    A telecom company that previously highlighted EBITDA must now disclose it as an MPM, reconcile it to IFRS-defined operating profit, and explain adjustments, giving investors a clearer view of sustainable earnings.

    Challenges for CFOs: From Compliance to Competitive Advantage

    While the benefits are clear, the transition to IFRS 18 presents critical challenges for finance leaders:

    1. System Overhaul: ERP and reporting systems must be reconfigured to reflect new categories and subtotals.
    2. MPM Governance: CFOs must ensure consistency, audit readiness, and strategic alignment of disclosed metrics.
    3. Segment Reporting Complexity: More granular disclosures may require restructuring internal reporting frameworks.
    4. Stakeholder Communication: Investor relations must adapt messaging to reflect IFRS 18’s structure and disclosures.

    Example:
    A multinational with diverse business units must now present segment results using IFRS 18’s structure. This may require redefining KPIs and retraining finance teams across jurisdictions.

    The Strategic Imperative for Leadership

    C-suite leaders should view IFRS 18 as an opportunity to refine the company’s financial narrative and build deeper trust with the market. Key actions include:

    • Proactive Engagement: Initiate cross-functional discussions with finance, audit, and board stakeholders.
    • Strategic Communication: Develop investor messaging that explains the new presentation and its implications.
    • KPI Alignment: Reassess how the new definition of operating profit affects internal performance metrics and executive compensation.

    Read more: Risk-Based Auditing for Nigerian Non-Profit Organizations: Enhancing Accountability and Effectiveness

    Conclusion: A New Era of Financial Clarity

    IFRS 18 is more than a technical update, it is a strategic mandate for clarity, consistency, and credibility. Organizations that embrace this change proactively will not only meet compliance requirements but also strengthen governance, enhance valuation credibility, and command investor confidence in an increasingly transparent financial landscape.

    For business leaders and CFOs preparing for the implementation of IFRS 18, expert guidance can make all the difference. If you have any questions or would like to understand how IFRS 18 may impact your financial reporting and strategy, reach out to us at [email protected]; our team is ready to help you navigate the transition, strengthen compliance, and communicate financial performance with greater clarity and confidence.

  • The Road to Trust: How GAID 2025 Will Shape Nigeria’s Digital Economy

    The Road to Trust: How GAID 2025 Will Shape Nigeria’s Digital Economy

    On March 12, 2025, the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) introduced the General Application and Implementation Directive (GAID) 2025. Coming into effect on September 19, 2025, GAID replaces the Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) 2019 and provides practical guidance for implementing the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023.

    More than a compliance manual, it strengthens enforcement, aligns Nigeria with global standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and reinforces accountability, transparency, and responsible data use.

    Below are the key provisions that will redefine data protection in Nigeria:

    • Registration and Classification of Data Controllers/Processors: GAID introduces a tiered system for organizations that process personal data, Ultra-High-Level (UHL), Extra-High-Level (EHL), and Other High-Level (OHL), based on the size and sensitivity of their data activities. Registration with the NDPC is mandatory for these categories.
    • Compliance Audits and Reporting: Organizations must prepare and file Compliance Audit Returns (CAR) with the NDPC. This requirement goes beyond paperwork; it demonstrates an active commitment to risk management and data protection.
    • Data Protection Officers (DPOs): Significant data-handling entities must appoint a DPO who reports directly to senior management. By embedding responsibility at the top, GAID ensures data protection is continuous, not a one-off exercise.
    • Risk Assessments for High-Risk Activities: Biometric collection, surveillance systems, and automated decision-making now require a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) before implementation. This anticipatory approach safeguards individuals’ rights while reducing organizational risk.
    • Cross-Border Data Transfers: Personal data cannot be exported freely. Transfers must either be to jurisdictions with adequate laws or be backed by binding legal agreements.
    • Rights of Individuals: GAID empowers citizens with stronger rights, including access, correction, and deletion of their personal data. The Standard Notice to Address Grievance (SNAG) creates a structured process for resolving complaints.

    Read more: Why NDPA Compliance is Essential for Your Company’s Survival

    What This Means in Practice

    GAID 2025 bridges the gap between policy and execution. Simplifying obligations into actionable steps, it empowers organizations to build trust while giving the NDPC sharper tools to monitor compliance and enforce sanctions.

    Penalty for Breach of Data Privacy

    Non-compliance carries weighty consequences: fines of 1%–2% of annual gross revenue or ₦2–₦10 million (whichever is higher), depending on the scale of data handled.

    Action Steps for Organizations

    1. Establish and implement NDPA-compliant data protection frameworks.
    2. Fulfill registration and classification obligations with the NDPC.
    3. Appoint qualified DPOs to oversee compliance.
    4. File Compliance Audit Returns (CAR) promptly.
    5. Train staff to embed data protection into daily operations.

    Read more: FIRS Extends Deadline for Large Taxpayers on E-Invoicing & E-Fiscal System (EFS)

    Conclusion

    GAID 2025 is more than a regulation; it is a blueprint for trust in Nigeria’s digital economy. While the NDPA sets the foundation, GAID delivers the roadmap. Organizations that act early will not only avoid sanctions but also gain a competitive edge by embedding privacy as a core business principle.

    At Stransact Chartered Accountants, we understand that navigating these changes requires more than regulatory awareness—it demands a proactive strategy. From impact assessments and compliance restructuring to executive workshops, we are committed to helping client’s transition confidently into the post-reform environment.

    To better understand how GAID 2025 impacts your industry, structure, or compliance obligations, reach out to our experts at [email protected] to schedule a tailored impact assessment or executive strategy session.

  • FIRS Extends Deadline for Large Taxpayers on E-Invoicing & E-Fiscal System (EFS)

    FIRS Extends Deadline for Large Taxpayers on E-Invoicing & E-Fiscal System (EFS)

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has announced a three-month extension for the mandatory onboarding and transmission of electronic invoices under the National E-Invoicing & Electronic Fiscal System (EFS) regime.

    This extension applies to Large Taxpayers (businesses with annual turnover of ₦5 billion and above) who are required to comply with the new Merchant-Buyer Solution (MBS) platform.

    While the E-Invoicing & EFS system officially went live on 1 August 2025, the deadline for full onboarding, integration, and mandatory compliance has now been shifted from 1 August 2025 to 1 November 2025. According to the FIRS, this adjustment recognizes the operational challenges faced by many taxpayers in meeting the initial timeline, despite the successful go-live of the platform.

    Presentation Slide: Merchant Buyer Solution e-Invoicing System

    What is the E-Invoicing & EFS System?

    The National E-Invoicing & Electronic Fiscal System (EFS) is a digital solution introduced by FIRS to modernize and streamline Nigeria’s tax compliance framework.

    Through the Merchant-Buyer Solution (MBS) platform, businesses will:

    • Issue invoices electronically in real-time.
    • Ensure transparency in transactions between buyers and sellers.
    • Enable automatic transmission of invoice data directly to FIRS.
    • Reduce risks of tax evasion, manipulation, or under-reporting.

    The system will also provide FIRS with more accurate transaction data, strengthening Nigeria’s tax administration and fostering a fairer business environment.

    Why the Extension Matters

    The extension offers taxpayers additional time to finalise their onboarding, integration, and compliance procedures. More importantly, it reflects FIRS’ commitment to encouraging voluntary compliance rather than penalizing businesses struggling with technical or operational bottlenecks.

    In its statement, the agency emphasized that the move is intended to create a smoother and more inclusive transition into the e-invoicing regime, allowing businesses to adapt without disruption to their operations.

    Read more: Navigating the Future of Tax Compliance: FIRS to Roll Out E-Invoicing in Nigeria

    FIRS’s Commitment to Support

    FIRS has pledged to continue working closely with stakeholders through engagements, technical support, and ongoing training programs. Businesses are encouraged to take advantage of this window to complete the necessary integrations and avoid last-minute compliance challenges.

    FIRS Executive Chairman, Zacch Adedeji, Ph.D., reaffirmed that the introduction of the e-invoicing platform is part of FIRS’ broader reforms aimed at modernizing Nigeria’s tax system, improving efficiency, and ensuring fairness in tax administration.

    Next Steps for Taxpayers

    With the new compliance deadline of 1st November 2025, large taxpayers are advised to:

    • Complete onboarding and system integration as soon as possible.
    • Train their accounting and finance teams on the use of the MBS platform.
    • Test invoice submissions to ensure smooth real-time reporting.

    Read more: Stransact, NRS upskill corporates on how to navigate Nigeria’s new tax landscape

    As businesses prepare for this transition, it is crucial to review existing invoicing and reporting processes to ensure full compliance with the new system. While the e-invoicing regime may present initial challenges, it also offers an opportunity to enhance transparency, strengthen controls, and improve efficiency.

    At Stransact Chartered Accountants, we are well-positioned to assist businesses in understanding the requirements, implementing compliant processes, and navigating any uncertainties. We encourage stakeholders to reach out to us for tailored guidance and support in adapting seamlessly to this reform.

  • Nigeria Tax Reform Act: What Businesses Need to Know

    Nigeria Tax Reform Act: What Businesses Need to Know

    On 26 June 2025, Nigeria entered a new era of taxation. With the signing of the Nigeria Tax Act (NTA), Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), Nigeria Revenue Service Establishment Act (NRSEA), and the Joint Revenue Board Establishment Act (JRBEA), the Federal Government has initiated a structural overhaul that redefines tax compliance, administration, and taxpayers’ obligations across board.

    Unlike previous reforms, these Acts are far-reaching in both scope and substance targeting digital transformation, widening the tax net, creating a more business friendly environment and rebalancing fiscal responsibilities across federal, state, and local authorities.

    The Nigeria Tax Act consolidates four major legislative instruments:

    • Nigeria Tax Act 2025

    The new Nigeria Tax Act 2025 introduces significant reforms to the country’s tax system, aiming to simplify tax administration, enhance compliance, and promote economic growth. The Act unifies the legal tax framework in Nigeria by creating a single statute for the taxation of all income, transactions and instruments. The NTA (effective 1 January 2026) shall repeal existing tax legislations such as the Companies Income Tax Act, Personal Income Tax Act, Capital Gains Tax, Value Added Tax, Petroleum Profits Tax Act, Stamp Duties Act, Industrial Development (Income Tax Relief) Act, among others.

    • Nigeria Tax Administration Act 2025

    The Nigeria Tax Administration Act as defined in its own Act is “an act to provide for the assessment, collection of, and accounting for revenue accruing to the federation, federal, states and local governments; prescribe the powers and functions of tax authorities, and for related matters”. The Act provides the operational backbone for the new tax regime by focusing on how taxes are to be administered and enforced. It sets out the rules, processes and powers for tax enforcement while also providing the clarity and structure for implementing the Nigeria Tax Act.

    • Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act 2025

    The Act repeals the Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act of 2007 and enacts the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act 2025 to establish the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) as the central tax authority tasked with the assessment, collection and accounting for tax revenue accruable to the Federal government. In simpler terms, the FIRS has now been replaced with the NRS with expanded mandates.

    • Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act 2025

    The newly passed Act establishes the Joint Revenue Board (JRB), replacing the Joint Tax Board as a more autonomous and inclusive body designed to harmonize tax administration across the country. It also creates the Office of the Tax Ombud and a restructured Tax Appeal Tribunal with increased scope to coordinate and settle disputes among tax stakeholders in matters of tax administration as well as promote the rights of taxpayers.

    Download the PDF version of this article

    Key highlights of the Nigeria Tax Act are as follows:

    Maintained VAT Rate and Expanded the scope of Input VAT Recovery
    • The VAT rate remains unchanged at 7.5%
    • VAT paid on all purchases including services and fixed assets will now be recoverable as input tax (within a period of 5 years) only to the extent it was incurred for the purpose of consumption, use or supply in the course of making taxable supplies.

    Rate of Tax for Companies to remain at 30%

    • Rate of tax for small companies is now 0%, while all other companies’ rate of tax shall be 30%.
    • A small company has now been defined as a company that earns a gross turnover of N100,000,000.00 or less per annum with total fixed assets not exceeding N250,000,000.00.
    • The rate of tax for large companies can be reduced to 25% effective from a date as may be determined in an Order issued by the President on the advice of the National Economic Council
    • The classification of medium sized companies has been expunged.
    • The rate of tax on chargeable gains from disposal of chargeable assets has been increased from 10% to 30% for corporate entities, except for small companies, which will be taxed at 0%. For individuals, such gains will now be subject to tax under the graduated tax rate for individuals rather than a flat rate. It is important to note that chargeable gains will now be included in computing the total profits of a company and the total income of an individual.

    Global Minimum Tax Implementation

    • The Minimum tax rate of 0.5% of gross turnover would no longer apply to companies with no taxable profit in Nigeria.
    • Members of an MNE group and companies with gross turnover of £750,000,000 and above or N50,000,000,000 and above will have to pay a minimum tax if their effective tax rate (i.e. covered taxes as a percentage of net income) is less than 15%. The Act requires such companies to recompute and pay an additional tax that brings its effective tax rate equal to 15%.
    • The effective tax rate has been defined to mean the rate produced by dividing the aggregate covered tax paid by a company for a year of assessment by the net income of the company. For this purpose, the net income is defined as the profit before tax as reported in the audited financial statements, excluding franked investment income and unrealistic gains or losses.

    4% Development Levy Replaces Multiple Levies

    • A 4% Development Levy on assessable profits of all companies except small companies and non-resident companies replaces the Tertiary Education Tax (TETFUND) and other levies.
    • The revenue accruing from the levy will be distributed as follows:
      • 50% to the Tertiary Education Trust Fund,
      • 15% to the Nigerian Education Loan,
      • 8% to the National Information Technology Development Fund,
      • 8% to the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure,
      • 4% to the National Board for Technological Incubation
      • 10% to the Defense and Security Infrastructure Fund and
      • 5% to the National Cybersecurity Fund.

    Revised Revenue and VAT Sharing Framework

    The Value Added Tax (VAT) revenue formula has been revised to be shared as follows among the Federal, State, and Local Government:

      • 10% to the Federal Government.
      • 55% to the State Governments and the Federal Capital Territory; and
      • 35% to the Local Governments.

    The revenue sharing formula among the State and Local Governments has also been adjusted as follows:

      • For States: 50% based on equality, 30% based on consumption, 20% based on population.
      • For Local Governments: 70% based on equality, 30% based on population.

    These formulae are designed to promote equitable revenue distribution and incentivize consumption-based development.

    Removal of Reasonability and Necessity Tests on Deductions

    • The longstanding subjective “reasonably” and “necessarily” tests for deducting business expenses have been abolished.
    • Deductibility will now rely solely on objective compliance with tax laws and actual business use, removing ambiguity and reducing disputes.

    Income Tax for Individuals

    The Act also introduces new tax rates for individuals ranging from 0% to 25% as follows:

    • First N800,000 at 0%;
    • Next N2,200,000 at 15%.
    • Next N9,000,000 at 18%.
    • Next N13,000,000 at 21%.
    • Next N25,000,000 at 23%; and
    • Above N50,000,000 at 25%.

    Individuals earning minimum wage in line with the Minimum Wage Act are exempted from income tax.

    Compensation or damages up to ₦50,000,000 for personal injury, professional injury, loss of office, libel, slander, or enticement are not taxable as chargeable gains. Only amounts exceeding ₦50,000,000 would be treated as a chargeable gain and subject to tax.

    Economic Development Incentive

    • The NTA repeals the Industrial Development Act and replaces the Pioneer Status Incentive (PSI) with the Economic Development Incentive (EDI). The EDI aims to stimulate capital investments in defined priority sectors, focusing on actual performance rather than blanket tax holidays.

    The EDI introduces key features such as

      • The implementation of 5% Economic Development Tax Credit (EDTC) on QCE per annum for 5 years (priority period), offsetting CIT payable
      • Unused EDIC can be carried forward for up to 5 years.
      • Possibility of a one-time 5-year extension if 100% of profits are reinvested, though clarity is needed on whether the 5% EDTC applies during the extension.

    Capital Allowance

    • Capital allowance on qualifying capital expenditure is no longer split into initial and annual Instead, a straight- line allowance is now applicable on assets categorized into either of the three classes: Class 1, 2 & 3 of Table 1 of the First Schedule of the NTA.
    • Intangible assets expenditure and software expenditure can now claim capital allowance under rates specified for Class 1 & 3 of Table 1 of the NTA respectively.

    Digital Compliance & E-invoicing

    • The Acts mandate VAT focalization, requiring taxpayers to adopt e-invoicing systems linked to the NRS for real-time transaction monitoring.
    • Profits or gains arising from transactions in digital or virtual assets are now classified as chargeable gains and will be subject to tax under the rules applicable to chargeable assets.
    • A National Single Window platform will integrate tax filings and payments, facilitating ease of doing business and reducing tax gaps.

    Tax Dispute Resolution Enhancements

    • The Office of the Tax Ombud will serve as an independent and impartial arbiter for review and resolution of disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities, improving fairness and reduced protracted litigation.
    • The Tax Appeal Tribunal is reconstituted with jurisdiction over all federal and state tax disputes, promising faster and more effective resolution.

    New Compliance Obligations for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs)

    • Businesses involved in virtual asset exchanges, custody, or management are required file detailed returns on virtual asset transactions, even without formal notification from tax authorities.

    Additional Assessments

    • The NTA provides that the relevant tax authority may continue a tax audit and raise additional assessments beyond the six-year limitation period, provided that the audit commenced before the expiration of that period. This ensures that ongoing audits can be concluded properly, and any further tax liabilities discovered during the process can still be assessed.
    • The NTA also provides that the relevant tax authority is now required to respond to a tax payer’s objection notice within 90 days. Where no response is provided within this period, the objection shall be deemed upheld in favor of the taxpayer.

    Mandatory Disclosure of Tax Planning Arrangements

    • The new framework introduces a proactive disclosure requirement for taxpayers engaging in tax planning arrangements aimed at securing a tax advantage. Any person who enters or intends to enter into a transaction or agreement primarily designed to confer a tax benefit must, without notice or request, disclose relevant details to the appropriate tax authority.

    The tax authority is empowered to issue regulations detailing:

    • The type of information to be disclosed,
    • The format and method of submission,
    • The timeline for disclosure, and
    • Applicable penalties for non-disclosure, false disclosure, or late/incomplete submissions.

    “Tax advantage” is broadly defined to include the reduction, deferral, or avoidance of tax liabilities or obligations, and applies to any transaction, scheme, or arrangement undertaken to achieve such benefits.

    Stricter Penalties and Offenses

    The reform enhances the penalty regime for tax non-compliance with higher fines and clearer offenses.

    Penalties applicable to companies (excluding those engaged in petroleum operations):
    S/N Offence Penalty
    1 Failure to register for tax ₦50,000 for first month + ₦25,000 for each subsequent month
    2 Awarding contract to unregistered person ₦5,000,000
    3 Failure to file returns / incomplete or inaccurate returns ₦100,000 for first month + ₦50,000 for each subsequent month
    4 Failure to keep books and records ₦10,000 (individual); ₦50,000 (company)
    5 Failure to grant access for deployment of technology ₦1,000,000 first day + ₦10,000 each subsequent day
    6 Failure to use focalization system ₦200,000 + 100% of tax due + interest at CBN MPR
    7 Failure to deduct tax 40% of amount not deducted
    8 Failure to make attribution / notify ₦1,000,000
    9 Failure to remit tax deducted or self-account Amount not remitted + 10% per annum penalty + interest at CBN MPR: also imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 50% of sum
    10 Failure to respond to notices / demands ₦100,000 first day + ₦10,000 each subsequent day
    11 Failure to supply info / records ₦200,000 first day + ₦10,000 each subsequent day
    12 Failure to comply with info obligations (legal arrangements) ₦1,000,000 first day + ₦10,000 each subsequent day
    13 VASP non-compliance ₦10,000,000 first month + ₦1,000,000 each subsequent month or license suspension/revocation
    14 Failure to stamp dutiable instruments 10% of unpaid duty + interest at CBN MPR
    15 Failure to disclose facts in dutiable instrument ₦100,000 admin penalty or ₦50,000 fine + 3 years jail or both
    16 Failure to notify change of address ₦100,000 first month + ₦5,000 each subsequent month
    17 Fraud in relation to stamps ₦2,000,000 fine or up to 3 years jail or both
    18 Offence by authorized/unauthorized persons (e.g. fraud, embezzlement) 200% of sum or up to 3 years jail or both
    19 Inducement of authorized officer ₦500,000 (individual); ₦2,000,000 (body corporate) + up to 3 years jail or both
    20 Use of weapon in offence Up to 5 years jail; injury: up to 10 years jail
    21 Impersonation of authorized officer ₦1,000,000 fine or up to 3 years jail or both
    22 Aiding and abetting ₦1,000,000 fine or up to 3 years jail or both
    23 Obstruction ₦1,000,000 admin penalty + ₦1,000,000 fine or up to 3 years jail or both
    24 Unauthorized disclosures of taxpayer info ₦1,000,000 fine or up to 3 years jail or both
    25 False claims of tax refund 50% of refund + interest + recovery of refund
    26 False/fictitious VAT refund claim 100% of refund + interest + recovery of refund
    27 Default in payment of mineral royalties 10% penalty + interest (SOFR + 10% for FX, CBN MPR for Naira)
    28 False declaration ₦1,000,000 admin penalty + tax undercharged or ₦1,000,000 fine + up to 3 years jail
    29 Counterfeiting documents ₦1,000,000 admin penalty + ₦1,000,000 fine or up to 3 years jail
    30 Offence by body corporate (responsible officers) Same penalty as individual unless no knowledge/consent
    31 General contravention without specific penalty ₦1,000,000 admin penalty or up to 3 years jail or both
    Penalties applicable to companies engaged in petroleum operations include:
    S/N Offence Penalty
    1 Failure to file estimated or actual returns on due 10,000,000 on first day + either 2,000,000 for each subsequent day of failure or another sum prescribed by Minister

    Interest at SOFR + 10% on differential of revised tax over estimated tax (if further return is not made)

    2 Late payments of tax, royalty or remittance 10% of unpaid sum + interest (SOFR +10% for FX or CBN MPR+ 2% for Naira

    10,000,000 or USD equivalent first day + either 2,000,000

    Possible distraint, cancellation, seizure, disposal or revocation of licenses or assets of the holder

    3 Failure to comply with notice / appear in response to notice or summons/ submit returns 10,000,000 on first day +2,000,000 for each day default continues

    10,000,000 fines on conviction for an offence + either 2,000,000 each day default continues or 6 months

    4 Incorrect accounts, schedules, statements or false information 15,000,000 + 1% of either of the correct or incorrect account undercharged tax (whichever is higher) + appropriate tax payable

    On conviction of an offence: Same penalty + possible imprisonment

    5 False statements / forged documents / prepares or aids false returns Either fine of 15,000,000 or 1% of tax amount (whichever is higher) or 6 months imprisonment or both fine & imprisonment
    6 Offence by authorized or unauthorized person (e.g. embezzlement, fraud Either 200% of sum in question or 3 years imprisonment or both
    7 Default in petroleum royalty payment (after 30 days) Same penalties as late tax payment: 10% of unpaid sum +

    interest +10,000,000 first day +2,000,000 per day thereafter

    8 General non-compliance where no specific penalty provided 10,000,000 +2,000,000 for each day of continued default
    9 Where no penalty is specifically provided Either 20,000,000 fine or another sum prescribed by Minister or 6 months imprisonment or both fine and imprisonment

    Conclusion

    The Nigerian Tax Reform Acts are more than an administrative update; they are a blueprint for a modernized tax ecosystem. While the scale of the instituted changes may appear daunting, it presents forward-thinking businesses with a timely opportunity to streamline operations, reinforce transparency, and rethink tax governance in a way that adds long-term value.

    Delaying tax readiness could expose your organization to compliance risks, revenue leakage, and reputational concerns especially with the rise of fiscal digitalization, mandatory disclosures, and enhanced regulatory scrutiny.

    At Stransact Chartered Accountants, we are committed to helping clients transition confidently into the post-reform environment. Whether through impact assessments, compliance restructuring, or executive workshops, we offer the insight and support necessary to align your tax strategy with evolving national and global expectations.

    To better understand how these reforms impact your specific industry, structure, or compliance obligations, reach out to our experts at [email protected] to schedule a tailored tax impact assessment or executive strategy session.

  • 5 Must-Reads for Forward-Thinking Leaders

    5 Must-Reads for Forward-Thinking Leaders

    At Stransact, we remain aligned to the ever-evolving landscape of business, regulation, and industry developments. Our weekly insights are designed to equip you with the foresight and clarity to make informed decisions and lead with impact.

    1. Avoid These Payroll Penalties: What Every Nigerian Employer Should Know

    Many Nigerian businesses are losing money not to fraud, but to payroll errors. Stransact offers practical strategies to help businesses stay compliant, avoid fines, and focus on sustainable growth.

    Discover what payroll compliance really means and how to stay ahead before it costs your business.
    👉 Read the article

    1. Renewed Hope Nigeria First Policy: A Strategic Shift Towards Local Content and Economic Sovereignty

    Many Nigerian businesses are missing out on growth not because of lack of potential, but because of poorly structured procurement processes.

    Want to find out how this policy could affect your industry and what to do next.
    👉 Read the article

    1. Third-Party Risk Management: Are Your Vendors Your Weakest Link?

    Vendors remain central to Nigeria’s economic growth, but without adequate governance, they can introduce significant operational, financial, and reputational risks.

    Discover why businesses are under growing pressure to strengthen their third-party risk management (TPRM) strategies—and how this shift represents a competitive edge for prepared service providers.

    👉 Read the article

    1. Navigating the Future of Tax Compliance: FIRS to Roll Out E-Invoicing in Nigeria

    This initiative is designed to improve VAT collection, reduce tax leakages, and align with Nigeria’s digital economy strategy by enabling real-time invoice validation, standardization, and secure transmission through integrated enterprise systems.

    The implementation of E-invoicing by the FIRS signals a clear direction toward a data-driven, digitally enabled tax system in Nigeria.
    👉 Read the article

    1. Navigating Global Governance in Oil & Gas: Why Board Advisory Matters More Than Ever

    Governance in the energy sector is no longer a compliance checkbox; it’s a business strategy.

    Discover how governance consulting is transforming African oil & gas boardrooms.
    👉 Read the article

     

    Follow Stransact for weekly insights on the future of business, finance, and regulation in Nigeria.